Rewarding the fruits of young labor.

The recipients of the first annual New York Academy of Sciences (NYAS) Blavatnik Awards for Young Scientists were honored recently at a gala dinner in New York City. The NYAS Blavatnik Awards for Young Scientists are made possible by a grant from the Blavatnik Charitable Foundation. The awards were established to reward young scientists and engineers (born, for the 2007 awards, on or after January 1, 1965) based in the New York metropolitan region — New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut — who have made innovative contributions to interdisciplinary research. NYAS President Ellis Rubinstein told the JCI that the idea for the new awards stemmed from both the efforts of the NYAS to identify and support exciting young scientists, as it does through its Frontiers of Science program (1), and the desire of Russian entrepreneur Leonard Blavatnik to provide financial support to a portfolio of young scientists. There were more than 250 applications for the inaugural awards, and these were narrowed down to 14 finalists by a panel of more than 40 prominent scientists. Each finalist was awarded $5,000, and five of these finalists were chosen as winners, receiving an additional $20,000. The use of the prize money is not restricted; although one of the winners, biologist Leslie Vosshall from The Rockefeller University, told the JCI that she had not yet figured out where to invest the money, she felt that the unrestricted funds would allow her group to do some risky things other funds would not. The awards were designed to recognize endeavors in the life, physical, and social sciences as well as engineering, and this is reflected in the breadth of the research being undertaken by the 2007 finalists — from teaching computers to interpret images, to making biodegradable plastics, to understanding how the immune system detects and responds to microorganisms. However, the research conducted in the laboratories of four of the five winners, even those considered physical scientists, might have clinical applications. For example, although the work of George Malliaras from Cornell University is in organic electronics, he is working on developing handheld medical diagnostic devices. Similarly, Milan Stojanovic from Columbia University is applying his research on nucleic acid– based molecular devices to medical problems, such as leukemias and lymphomas. Traditional biological science is conducted in the laboratory of Vosshall, who told the JCI that her interest in science began when she was a high school junior and her uncle, who was a scientist at Syracuse University, invited her to work in his summer laboratory. There she discovered that laboratory science had no resemblance to the dreary textbooks and rote memorization of high school science. Much of Vosshall’s research uses the genetically tractable animal Drosophila melanogaster to understand how the brain interprets odors and how this contributes to specific behavior, but a collaborative project that she has recently begun aims to determine how olfactory signals have an impact on the host-seeking behavior of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae, a carrier of the parasite that causes malaria. The hope is that understanding this might lead to the development of a highly effective insect repellent that would help reduce the transmission of the malariacausing parasite. Fellow winner Ruslan Medzhitov from Yale University was described as “unique” by Alexander Rudensky, Professor of Immunology at the University of Washington, Seattle, and a postdoc in immunologist Charles Janeway’s laboratory before Medzhitov. Rudensky told the JCI that he doesn’t know anyone in the biomedical sciences who thinks conceptually like Medzhitov, who can turn complex conceptual programs into testable hypotheses. Medzhitov’s group studies how the evolutionarily conserved arm of the immune system, the innate immune system, recognizes microorganisms and how it responds to such recognition. This interest stems from his postdoctoral work in Janeway’s laboratory, in which he played a central